In South Bend-Mishawaka, IN-MI, one of the four signals is elevated: store closures read 5 closures, or 4.29 per 100k jobs, against 0 notices for layoff notices (WARN) at 0%, bank CRE at lenders over the noncurrent line of $75.3mm at 5%, and 2 loan records for securitized loans in special servicing — though that last figure cannot be read, since legs that cannot be read mean an absence of measurement rather than a quiet reading. Across the pairs compared, pairs with both legs elevated number 0, pairs with both legs quiet number 1, and pairs where the legs disagree number 2, while pairs that cannot be read because a leg is blind come to 3. The count that is elevated is not elevated by size alone.
| Signal | Level | Rate | Rank by count | Rank by rate | Reading |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| store closures store closures per 100,000 jobs |
5 closures | 4.29 per 100k jobs | 92 of 392 | 54 of 392 | elevated trailing 365 days to today
|
| layoff notices (WARN) workers on layoff notices as a share of the metro's employment |
0 notices | 0% | 314 of 382 | 308 of 382 | quiet trailing 365 days to today
|
| bank CRE at lenders over the noncurrent line share of the CRE lent into this metro that sits at a lender over the blended-noncurrent line |
$75.3mm | 5% | 177 of 393 | 143 of 393 | quiet
allocated 2026-06-30
|
| securitized loans in special servicing share of the securitized balance read here that is in special servicing |
2 loan records | — | — | — | cannot be read
not measurable 2026-09-29
|
In South Bend-Mishawaka, IN-MI, the elevated signal is store closures, while the credit picture is obscured: bank CRE lent into this metro stands at $1.50bn with bank CRE at risk at the 90th percentile of 5.3%, and CRE at lenders over the noncurrent line is $75.3mm, equal to 5.0% of that exposure, against assets at those lenders of $0.10bn and a share of bank CRE needing no branch-deposit allocation of 0.5%; the securitized reading is unavailable — CMBS in special servicing shows $0.0mm and share of this metro's CMBS balance in special servicing 0.0%, but those rows carry no balance, so this is a gap in the tape rather than an absence of distress, and the phase is obscured with credit side unreadable.
| Bank | Deposit share | CRE / Capital* | Room contributed | Noncurrent CRE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lake City Bank IN | 7.5% | 209% total 294%
|
🔒 | 0.14% |
| Northwest Bank PA | 1.2% | 109% total 145%
|
🔒 | 1.53% |
| Centier Bank IN | 2.4% | 265% total 318%
|
🔒 | 1.52% |
| First State Bank Of Middlebury IN | 4.9% | 141% total 251%
|
🔒 | 0.58% |
| First Federal Savings Bank IN | 5.6% | 189% total 196%
|
🔒 | 0.00% |
| Horizon Bank IN | 0.5% | 235% total 331%
|
🔒 | 0.26% |
| First Merchants Bank IN | 0.0% | 183% total 243%
|
🔒 | 0.59% |
| Bank | Total CRE | CRE / Capital* | Noncurrent CRE | Early Warning |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1st Source Bank | $1.2B | 56% total 89%
|
0.17% | 🔒 |
Yes, comfortably. The metro's capacity band reads as slack: the CMBS maturing in the window is $21.5mm across 1 loan, while 7 qualifying local banks hold local bank room, before committed draws of $130.9mm, which falls to local bank room, after those draws of $78.1mm once committed construction draws of $52.7mm are deducted. The resulting Wall-to-room ratio is 0.27, or 0.16 before committed draws — above the median but still under a third of available room, and the distressed share of this metro's CMBS is 0.0%. Two caveats temper this: 3 banks are excluded from the calculation, so part of the lending capacity is simply invisible here, and the overall ranking (129 out of this many metros ranked, 275, counted from most strained) places South Bend-Mishawaka in the less strained half.
Over the recent 365-day window in South Bend-Mishawaka, IN-MI, the ground-level readings show 5 store closures approved and matched to the metro, while WARN layoff notices came in at 0, so jobs on those notices stand at 0 (with the caveat that notices stating no headcount contribute zero jobs, making this a floor). CRE-related bankruptcies registered 5, though this is a state-level proxy rather than a metro-native count, so it should not be read as activity inside the metro itself.