Start free trial
No credit card required
Commercial Real Estate Credit —
Norwich-New London-Willimantic, CT
The state of disclosed CRE credit in this market · CT
The read
$63M of CMBS across 7 loans. The heaviest maturity load lands in 2031 ($29M, 46% of the book). Distress is flat in the filed record — 0.0% as of 2026-07. 7 on-the-ground distress events in the past year (70 jobs).
Overview
CMBS
Submarkets
Local Banks
Jobs & Demand
On The Ground
Loading map…
The CMBS properties our stress model flags here, plus recent store closures and layoffs. Stressed is a wider net than distressed — the distressed figure above counts only loans already in special servicing or 60+ days delinquent, while these dots also include performing loans facing maturity or coverage pressure. Property dots sit at the center of their ZIP code, not the building — they show where stress concentrates, not which asset. Closures and layoffs are pinned to address where we have it. Open any dot to the building and the loan behind it →
CMBS Distressed UPB
under $1M / 0.0%
in special servicing or 60+ days delinquent
CMBS Maturing ≤ 24mo
$6M
Banks HQ’d Here (stressed)
0 / 0
Bank Early-Warning
0 flagged
Store Closures (1y)
5
Layoff Notices (1y)
2 / 70 jobs
0.07% of metro employment
CMBS Loans / UPB
7 / $63M
Unemployment · Aug 2026
4.3%
+0.4pp yr
Office-Using Jobs · 2024
12,777
How much CRE distress is there in Norwich-New London-Willimantic, CT right now?
Of the four legs tracked for Norwich-New London-Willimantic, CT, 1 is elevated, and the store closures leg carries 5 closures at 5 per 100k jobs, ranked 92nd of 392 by count and 39th by rate. The layoff notices (WARN) leg shows 2 notices at 0.05%, a floor because only part of the notices report headcount, while bank CRE at lenders over the noncurrent line reads $0 at 0%, an allocated figure. Securitized loans in special servicing is legs that cannot be read here — the row count of 1 loan records has no rate to divide by — so that leg is silent on distress rather than quiet; across the six pairs of legs compared, 2 disagree, 1 is quiet on both sides, none are elevated on both, and 3 cannot be read because a side is blind.
The figures behind this answer
| Signal | Level | Rate | Rank by count | Rank by rate | Reading |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| store closures store closures per 100,000 jobs |
5 closures | 5 per 100k jobs | 92 of 392 | 39 of 392 | elevated trailing 365 days to today
|
| layoff notices (WARN) workers on layoff notices as a share of the metro's employment |
2 notices | 0.05% | 170 of 382 | 203 of 382 | quiet
floor trailing 365 days to today
|
| bank CRE at lenders over the noncurrent line share of the CRE lent into this metro that sits at a lender over the blended-noncurrent line |
$0 | 0% | 354 of 393 | 354 of 393 | quiet
allocated 2026-06-30
|
| securitized loans in special servicing share of the securitized balance read here that is in special servicing |
1 loan records | — | — | — | cannot be read
not measurable 2026-09-29
|
6 pairs compared
0 both elevated
1 both quiet
2 disagreeing
3 unreadable — a side is blind
1 of four legs elevated
blind: securitized loans in special servicing
one metro, four independent feeds, each on its own denominator
124 of 447 metros have at least one blind leg and 54 are blind on all four. Those 54 are the same metros the board's map cannot place and the metro resolver cannot name: one ZIP-to-CBSA crosswalk boundary, showing up three ways.
Elevation is computed on the COUNT, over a flat threshold, which is a size filter. New York is 2nd of 392 by store closures and 264th of the same 392 by closures per job — both true, and which one you lead with decides what the reader believes.
Where two legs disagree, that is usually a fact about WHICH mechanism is running, not an error in either feed and not a worse metro.
A leg with no denominator, or whose numerator cannot be measured, reads LOW and means nothing. Each leg publishes a measurement state (allocated, floor, measured, no denominator, no rate, not measurable) for that reason.
a blind leg is not a quiet one — securitized loans in special servicing cannot be read here. Their low numbers are an absence of MEASUREMENT.
Store closures: divided by 100,064 jobs
— all metro jobs, QCEW annual average — a SIZE normaliser, not a matched population: the feed spans retail, food service and pharmacy and no single QCEW sector covers it. The MATCHED read sits beside it as this leg's second reading (trailing 365 days to today).
Layoff notices (WARN): divided by 134,051 employed
— employed persons, BLS LAUS, not seasonally adjusted (trailing 365 days to today).
Bank CRE at lenders over the noncurrent line: divided by $2,233.4 mm
— bank CRE allocated to this metro by branch deposits (2026-06-30).
Securitized loans in special servicing: divided by $63.0 mm
— current balance on the non-pari-passu rows of this tape — the trust's slice, not the whole loan, on both sides of the ratio (2026-09-29).
Written from the figures above · CBSA 35980 · stress_metro · last changed 01 Nov 2026
· Ask your own question →
Which distress signals are elevated in Norwich-New London-Willimantic, CT, and which cannot be read?
In Norwich-New London-Willimantic, CT, the elevated distress signal is store closures, while bank-side CRE stress appears limited: bank CRE at risk at the 90th percentile stands at 14.2% against bank CRE lent into this metro of $2.23bn, and CRE at lenders over the noncurrent line is $0.0mm. The securitized side cannot be read: CMBS in special servicing shows $0.0mm and the share of this metro's CMBS balance in special servicing shows 0.0%, but the reading is unavailable as a true zero because the tape rows carry no balance, so the securitized picture is unmeasured rather than quiet.
The figures behind this answer
- CMBS in special servicing
- $0.0mm
- … as a share of this metro's CMBS balance
- 0.0%
- Bank CRE lent into this metro
- $2.23bn
- … at risk at the 90th percentile
- 14.2%
- CRE at lenders over the noncurrent line
- $0.0mm
- Assets at those lenders
- $0.00bn
- … share needing no branch-deposit allocation
- 23.5%
- Signals reading elevated
- store closures
- Legs agreeing
- 1
- Phase
- obscured
- CMBS loans in special servicing
- 1
- Distressed banks
- 0
- Store closures (past year)
- 5
- WARN notices (past year)
- 2
the ground is deteriorating, and whether CRE credit has been hit here CANNOT BE READ: not one of this metro's 1 special-servicing rows carries a balance — the securitized side is invisible here, which is not the same as quiet
little to no distressed CRE dollars behind the signals; and the securitized side is NOT MEASURED here — all 1 loans in special servicing sit on tape rows carrying no balance, so the $0 is a gap in the tape, not an absence of distress
the ground is wobbling (closures / layoffs) but little CRE-credit distress sits behind it yet — a real-economy signal, not (yet) a CRE-credit event
Written from the figures above · CBSA 35980 · geo_metro_signals · last changed 01 Nov 2026
· Ask your own question →
Jobs & Demand — the labor market under the collateralWatch it change →
Every other zone on this page reads the credit — what the loan is doing.
This one reads the demand underneath it. Office jobs pay office rent;
office rent services the office loan. When the jobs go, the DSCR follows — but not for another year or two.
That lag is the whole point of looking here.
Unemployment · Aug 2026
4.3%
+0.4pp yr
Last 24 months
2.8%5.6%
Monthly metro unemployment (BLS LAUS) — the freshest labor signal there is,
about six weeks behind. Read the direction, not the level: a 4% metro that is rising and a 6% metro that is
falling are not telling you the same thing.
Jobs by CRE-relevant sector · 2024
Annual employment by sector (BLS QCEW, 2024; 100,064 jobs in the metro).
QCEW lags — it is the structural read, not the current one, and we pair it with the monthly unemployment above on purpose.
Office-using sums five supersectors; where BLS withholds any one of them for
disclosure, we show nothing rather than a number we know is too low — so a missing sector here means
“suppressed at the source,” not “zero.”
Sector Heat — CMBS distress rate by property type (metro vs national)See the loans behind the bar →
Too few CMBS loans here (7) to say whether this metro's rate is explained by its property mix — that comparison needs 25.
No CMBS sector data for this metro.
Maturity Wall — CMBS coming due by year, distress within eachSee what’s maturing →
$6M — 10% of the metro's balance — matures within two years; the red slice of each bar is already distressed.
Distress Trend — is this market turning?Track it quarter by quarter →
Realized distress is FLAT — 0.0% now (2026-07), +0.0pp over the year.
Same definition as the cards above — distressed means in special servicing or 60+ days delinquent, dollar-weighted — on a different clock. The cards are today’s tape; this is the disclosed history panel, quarter by quarter, so you can read direction rather than level. Trusts file monthly, so a quarter is usually well covered within weeks of opening and the newest one shown is normally the current one; it is withheld only when its filed book falls below 60% of recent quarters.
Share of the metro’s CMBS in special servicing or 60+ days delinquent, by quarter — a firmer, backward-looking read. A loan under 1.0x DSCR that is still paying is not counted here.
Submarket Heat — where in the metro the distress sitsOpen the submarket →
The top three submarkets hold $47M of the metro's $63M; each bar's colored share is its distress rate.
Bank Door — what the local bank sector could absorbSee it on every loan’s exit read →
$6M of CMBS matures here within two years.
The 7 regional and local banks that gather deposits here could write roughly
$203M more CRE before the 300% supervisory line, so the maturing balance is
0.03× that room.
The median metro sits at 0.13×.
Regional Bank Room
$203M
After Committed Draws
$51M / −75%
Maturing ÷ Room
0.03×
Banks In Footprint
7 / 2 at the line
The room above is already part-sold. Construction lending is a promise drawn
down over two or three years, and the undrawn part is an obligation the bank cannot decline while the borrower performs
— every one of those dollars lands in the same CRE book the 300% line governs. These banks
have $192M of construction committed and not yet
advanced, of which $152M
comes out of the room above, leaving $51M,
with 5 banks
whose entire remaining room is spoken for.
A bank with no room contributes zero here, never a negative one — capacity does not net
across balance sheets — so $40M of what has
been promised is not deducted at all, because there is nothing left to deduct it from. On today’s
capital that is funding already contracted which would cross the line as it draws.
SR 07-1 draws a second line at 100% of capital for construction and land:
2 more cross it
once their own commitments fund.
Counted — 7 regional & local CRE lenders
| Bank | Deposit share | CRE / Capital* | Room contributed | Noncurrent CRE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Liberty Bank CT | 14.5% | 256% total 271%
|
🔒 | 0.38% |
| Dime Bank CT | 85.1% | 246% total 313%
|
🔒 | 0.09% |
| Jewett City Savings Bank CT | 45.6% | 200% total 299%
|
🔒 | 0.94% |
| Ascend Bank CT | 13.9% | 256% total 334%
|
🔒 | 0.07% |
| Centreville Bank RI | 4.9% | 268% total 312%
|
🔒 | 2.95% |
| Beacon Bank And Trust MA | 2.7% | 336% total 412%
|
🔒 | 0.82% |
| The Washington Trust Company, Of Westerly RI | 1.8% | 333% total 382%
|
🔒 | 1.22% |
Not counted — 7 banks with deposits here
These hold deposits in this metro but are left out of the capacity above, because for them deposit location stops indicating where they lend — or they do not lend CRE at all. Real money that could refinance here is deliberately not counted.
no CRE book — CRE under 100% of capital — not a CRE lender
Chelsea Groton Bank CT · Bank Of America, National Association NC · Citizens Bank, National Association RI · Td Bank, National Association DE · Keybank National Association OH · Jpmorgan Chase Bank, National Association OH
national — operates in more than 5 states, so deposits stop indicating where it lends
* Two ratios, two perimeters.
The large figure is supervisory CRE over total risk-based capital —
construction, multifamily and non-owner-occupied nonfarm nonresidential. That is the book SR 07-1 draws its
300% line against, and it is what the red coloring and the room contributed are both measured on.
Total beneath it adds owner-occupied CRE — lending to a business on
its own premises — which the guidance deliberately leaves out. A bank can sit well above 300% on total CRE and
still be inside the line, with real room to lend; both are shown so the gap is visible rather than surprising.
How to read this. It is not whether any particular loan can refinance — a borrower also reaches
national banks, life companies, agencies and debt funds. It is how much of this metro’s maturing volume the local
bank sector could absorb if it were the only door.
Banks are placed by deposit share (FDIC Summary of Deposits, June 2026) — a proxy for
where they lend, not a measurement; call reports carry no collateral geography. Room = 3× total risk-based capital less CRE held
(SR 07-1, the capital base the rule names — not book equity), from Q2 2026 call reports, apportioned by that share.
Committed construction comes from FFIEC Schedule RC-L as filed at 2026-06-30 —
the undrawn half of loans already written, which the balance sheet above does not show.
Banks in more than 5 states, single-branch bookers and banks that do not lend CRE are excluded —
315 banks holding $263.8B of national capacity not counted here.
Local Lenders — banks headquartered here, worst CRE noncurrent firstUnlock each bank’s early-warning flag →
No locally-headquartered banks in our FDIC data for this metro.
Do the banks lending in Norwich-New London-Willimantic, CT have the capacity to refinance its maturing CRE?
Yes, with room to spare. The CMBS maturing in the window is $6.4mm across this many loans: 1, against local bank room, before committed draws of $203.1mm and local bank room, after those draws of $50.9mm, with committed construction draws of $192.0mm. That puts the wall-to-room ratio at 0.12, or 0.03 before committed draws, well inside the capacity band of slack and below the median; qualifying local banks number 7, while banks excluded from the calculation number 1. Total CMBS balance here is $63.5mm, and the distressed share of this metro's CMBS is 0.0%.
The figures behind this answer
- CMBS maturing in the window
- $6.4mm
- … across this many loans
- 1
- Local bank room, before committed draws
- $203.1mm
- Committed construction draws
- $192.0mm
- Local bank room, after those draws
- $50.9mm
- Wall-to-room ratio
- 0.12
- Rank, most strained
- 190
- … out of this many metros ranked
- 275
- … before committed draws
- 0.03
- Population ranked against
- CMBS maturing within 24 months against regional/community bank room in this metro
- Qualifying local banks
- 7
- … excluded from the calculation
- 1
- Distressed share of this metro's CMBS
- 0.0%
- Total CMBS balance here
- $63.5mm
- Capacity band
- slack
Compared against a median wall-to-room ratio of
0.24 across the ranked metros.
0.12 is BELOW the median of 0.24, so this metro is LESS strained than the typical ranked metro
190 of 275, counting from the MOST strained — a LOWER rank number means MORE strain
Room is what regional and community banks could still write before the SR 06-26 concentration line, after deducting construction draws already committed. Deposit footprint is a proxy for lending footprint, not a measurement of it.
The most extreme ratios belong to the smallest metros.
The wall is the CMBS balance maturing within 24 months — the maturing debt this platform can see, not the metro's whole maturity load. Every ratio is an upper bound on how much of it local banks would have to absorb.
A high ratio is as often an exclusion artifact as a credit event. Banks whose deposits do not indicate where they lend (nationals, card and charter banks) are excluded from the room, so a metro served mainly by those reads strained while its credit is simply invisible here.
Written from the figures above · CBSA 35980 · capacity_metro · last changed 30 Oct 2026
· Ask your own question →
On The Ground — recent closures, layoffs & CRE bankruptciesTie these events to loans →
7 local distress events in the past year (70 jobs) — store closures, layoffs, and commercial real estate bankruptcies near this metro's collateral.
2026-10-27
LAYOFF
Colchester
2026-10-20
LAYOFF
70 jobs · Colchester
2026-09-09
CLOSURE
Norwich
2026-09-09
CLOSURE
Norwich
2026-04-30
CLOSURE
Mashantucket
2025-12-31
CLOSURE
Willimantic
2025-12-31
CLOSURE
Norwich
2025-05-31
CLOSURE
Norwich
2025-01-31
CLOSURE
Groton
What has actually happened on the ground in Norwich-New London-Willimantic, CT recently?
Over the past 365 days, the Norwich-New London-Willimantic, CT metro has seen 5 store closures, 2 WARN layoff notices, and 70 jobs affected on those notices (a floor, since notices stating no headcount contribute zero). CRE-related bankruptcies stand at 0, though that figure is a state-level proxy rather than a metro-native count.
The figures behind this answer
- Store closures
- 5
- WARN layoff notices
- 2
- Jobs on those notices
- 70
- CRE-related bankruptcies
- 0
- Window, in days
- 365
STATE PROXY — a court case counts in its filing district and an SEC 8-K in the filer's state, not where the property is, so this counts CRE-likely filings in the states this metro's collateral sits in. It is not a metro-native count. Each court case is counted once even when both PACER and CourtListener carry it. A court case's state is its filing district; an SEC 8-K or news item carries the filer's state. Coverage widened to both court feeds on 2026-09-16, so counts before and after that date are not comparable.
affected_employees is nullable — notices that state no headcount are counted but contribute 0 jobs, so this is a floor.
Closures are matched ZIP -> CBSA and only APPROVED rows count (a pending, machine-extracted row is not yet a closure). This mirrors the Metro Pulse page, not the convergence board — the board applies neither filter and counts higher. Layoffs take the same ZIP -> CBSA and review treatment, and a WARN notice counts if it affects >= 10 people or does not state a headcount (a NULL is not 'fewer than 10').
Written from the figures above · CBSA 35980 · geo_events · last changed 30 Oct 2026
· Ask your own question →
What this page can’t do
Everything above is a snapshot — one market, as it stands today, and
it’s yours to read. What a snapshot can’t tell you is when it moves: which loan slipped a DSCR band
this month, which bank’s early-warning rank crossed into the top quartile, which submarket started turning
while the headline number still looked fine. Distress doesn’t announce itself on the day you happen to check.
This page
One metro · one moment · you come looking.
Verstavo
Every metro · every month · it comes looking for you.
CMBS covers the securitized slice of CRE; bank, closure and layoff signals widen the view.
“No data” in a zone means we don’t observe it here, not that there is no stress.
Employment is BLS (QCEW annual, LAUS monthly) — public data, and the demand leg under all of it.
See the whole picture, not just the pulse.
Metro Pulse is the free, public read — one page for every market we cover. The platform goes loan‑by‑loan inside it: which buildings carry the stress, when their debt comes due, and your own portfolio benchmarked against the market you are standing in.